High CourtsSingle Bench

SANDEEP BISHT vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 24 May 2018 · Citation: (2018) 05 UK CK 0114

HON’BLE JUDGES
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1366 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 162 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J

1.

The petitioner was given permission to pick the river bed material from river “Khohâ€, District Tehri Garhwal and for doing that the petitioner

was given permission to use the machines till 30.04.2018.Â

2. Now the period till when the permission was granted to use machines for picking river bed material has expired. Meaning thereby, the petitioner

cannot use the machines any further. Subsequently, the petitioner moved an application for allowing the use of machines for river bed material, which

has been rejected by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kotdwar vide order dated 05.05.2018, relying upon the River Training Policy, 2016.

3.

Perused the River Training Policy, 2016 as well as the impugned order dated 05.05.2018. The policy categorically states that as far as possible only

the manpower be used for picking river bed material. Consequently, this Court finds no fault in the order dated 05.05.2018.

4.

Writ petition is therefore liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed.Â

Â