High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Sandeep Singh @ Deepa vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 13 January 2017 · Citation: (2017) 01 P&H CK 0238

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surinder Gupta
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=3863>Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973</a>, <a href=3863-439>Section 439</a> - Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail · <a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-34>Section 34</a>, <a href=1767-364>Sec
CASE NUMBER
179 of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

32 paragraphs · 394 words
1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 117 dated

27.06.2011 registered for offences punishable under Sections 383, 364 read

with Section 34 IPC, at Police Station Sarabha Nagar, District Ludhiana.

2.

Heard.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

On asking of the court, Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab, who

is present in the Court accepts notice and submits that intimation by

Registry informing of fixation of the petition has already been received and

record of the case is available with her.

5.

Petitioner is facing trial in the instant FIR before the Additional

Sessions Judge, Ludhiana. The petitioner absented during trial on

11.11.2016 and surrendered in the Court on 03.12.2016 and is in custody

since then.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that absence of the

petitioner was due to death of his grandfather and was not intentional. He

has surrendered in the Court of his own.

7.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner earlier also

remained absent and was declared proclaimed offender. His presence was

procured by issuance of production warrants on 17.10.2015 and he was

allowed benefit of regular bail on 23.12.2015. As the petitioner is habitual

of remaining absent he should not be allowed benefit of regular bail.

8.

On giving a careful thought to submissions of learned counsel

for the petitioner and learned State counsel and keeping in view the fact that

petitioner has surrendered in the Court of his own on 03.12.2016 i.e. within

a period of about four weeks and has also given reasons for his remaining

absent, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner-Sandeep Singh @ Deepa

is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety

bond to the satisfaction of concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty

Magistrate, subject to following terms:-

a. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. b. In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

c. He shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court.