Sandev vs Union Of India And Others

OA 750/2020

The challenge in this 0.A is against impugned letter dated 1 3th February, 2020, issued by the third respondent rejecting the request of the applicant

for grant of second service pension for the service rendered by him in Defence Security Corps (DSC) on the ground of not having completed the

mandatory qualifying service of 15 years to make him eligible for the second service pension.

It is the conceded position that the applicant had rendered 14 years and 08 months and 02 days of service in DSC and there is a shortfall of 03

months and 28 days against the mandatory 15 years of qualifying service, which made him ineligible for the second service pension for the service

rendered with DSC. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record.

The question involved in this case is no longer zrs integra, as the same had already been settled by this Tribunal in the case of Bhani Devi Vs.

Union of India and others (0.A. No. 60 of 2013 decided on 07.11.2013), Ex Nk Vijay Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors. (OA No.272 of 2018 decided

on 14.10.2020) and the Kochi Bench of this Tribunal in Mohanan T Vs. Union of India and Ors. (OA No.131 of 2017 decided by Kochi Bench of this

Tribunal on 12.10.2017). In B.hani Devi (supra), it was held that the provisions for condonation of shortfall in service under Regulation 125 of the

Pension Regulations for the Army 1961 (Part I) are equally applicable to Armed Forces personnel serving in DSC making them eligible for grant of

second service pension. Against the order in Ex Nk Mohanan T (supra), granting condonation of shortfall of DSC service, subsequent to the issue of

GoI (MoD) letter dated 20.06.2017, the respondents had approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court by filing Civil Appeal (Diary) No.27100 of 2018,

which was dismissed vide order dated 27.08.2018 and thus the matter has attained finality. This Tribunal in Ex 1Vk Vijay Singh (supra), while

referring to the Full Bench decision of this Tribunal in Smt Shama Kaur V s. Union of India and Ors (OA No.1238 of 2016 decided on 01.10.2019),

which dealt with the question whether there should be condonation of deficiency of service for grant of second pension of DSC like Regular Army

personnel in terms of Government of India (Ministry of Defence) letter dated 14.08.2001 and Para 44 of the Army Pension Regulations or be dealt

with in terms of Government of India (Ministry of Defence) letter dated 20.06.2017, quoted para 44 of that judgment which reads as under:

(a) The aspect has been discussed in fir.11 detail in our discussion above on merits. It needs no further emphasis that the DSC is a part of the Army

and is also treated as a 'Corps"" wider Rule 187(1)(r) of the Army Rules, 1954, read. with Section 3(vi) of the Army Act, 1950. Further the same

pensionary provisions as applicable to the three defence services are applicable to the DSC and all such personnel taken together are referred as

Armed Forres Personnel"" as becomes clear from the opening paragraphs of Letter No. 1(5)87/D (Pension/Services) dated 30.10.1987, Letter No.

1(6)198-D(Pension/Services) dated 03.02.1998, Letter No.17(4)] 2008(2)/Datn/Pol) dated 12.11.2008 and Para 3.1 of Letter No. 17 (02)/2016-

D(Pen/Pol) dated 04.09.2017 issued by the Ministry of Defence after the 4th, 5111, 6th and 7th Central Pay Commissions respectively.

(b) The matter has already been decided by Constitutional Courts and this Tribunal and implemented by the Respondents, especially in the decision of

the HonSge Punjab & Haryana High Court in Union of India v. LNK DSC Mani Ram (LPA No. 755 of 2010 decided on 05.07.2010), the Honlde

Delhi High Court in Ex Sep Madan Singh v. Union of India (WI' (C) No. 9593 of 2003), this Bench in Bhani Devi V. Union of India and others (0.A

No. 60 of 2013 decided on 07.11.2013) and the Kochi Bench in Mohanan T v. Union of India (0.A No. 131 of 2017 decided on 12.10.2017). The

letters purportedly amend* the relevant provisions have also been held contrary to law vide the above. In light of this, coupled with the merits of the

matter discussed in the instant judgement, there can be no scope of any doubt that DSC personnel are fully entitled to condonation of deficiency of

service for their second spell of service at par with other Army personnel. In fact, as discussed in the main body of this judgement, DSC personnel re

enrolling themselves by opting not to count their past military service have no connection at all with their past service as far as pension is concerned

and their service in DSC is fresh service delinked from their past service.

(c) Further, the Respondents have themselves stated before the HonTole Supreme Court in Chat-tar Pal (supra) that condonation upto one year is

possible, and once Constitutional Courts, including the highest Court of the land, have upheld the proposition, it is beyond the scope of any bench of this

tribunal to hold or comment otherwise. We hence answer this question in the above terms.

Taking into account the aforesaid factual and legal aspects, we are of the considered view that the facts of this case are also squarely covered by

the decisions in B.hani Devi and Ex Nk Vijay Singh (supra) and, therefore, the shortfall of 03 months and 28 days to complete 15 years of qualifying

service in DSC by the applicant to get second service pension is liable to be condoned.

The instant 0.A is, therefore, allowed with the following directions:

(i) The shortfall of 03 months and 28 days of qualifying service for second service pension is condoned;

(ii) Subject to verification of records, the respondents are directed to issue a corrigendum PPO to the applicant granting second service pension for the

service rendered by him in DSC, from the date of his discharge; and

(iii) The arrears shall be paid within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In default, the applicant will be entitled to interest @

6% per annum till payment.

No order as to costs.