High CourtsDivision Bench

Sangita Devi vs State Of Bihar And Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 3 June 2020 · Citation: (2020) 06 PAT CK 0018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6147 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 393 words

Sanjay Karol, CJ

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

"(i). For direction upon the respondent authority to complete the work of piped water supply in Ward No. 3, Majhauli Gram Panchayat, Manjhauli Block, District- Vaishali under the scheme of Mukhyamantri Pey Jal Nishchay Yojna through the Public Health and Engineering Department (hereinafter referred to as PHED).

(ii) For direction upon the respondent authority to supply the estimated cost of piped water supply in Ward No. 3 to the Ward Vikas Samiti.

(iii) For direction upon the respondent to transfer the fund in the account of Ward Vikas Samiti of Ward No. 3 as per estimate and recommendation of finance committee.

(iv) For direction upon the Respondent no. 6 to consider the application of the petitioner and after giving proper opportunity of hearing take decision in accordance with law.

(v) And/or for grant of any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled, in the facts and circumstances of this case."

During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued  to  the  respondent  authority  i.e.  District  Magistrate, Vaishali  (Respondent  No.  6)  to  consider  and  decide  the petitioner's request so addressed to him (Annexure-2 and 3 series) expeditiously, in accordance with law.

Shri Sarvesh Kumar Singh learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State does not have any objection to the same.

As such, we dispose of the present petition on the following mutually agreeable terms:

(a). All issues on merits are left open.

(b) Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No. 6, namely, District Magistrate, Vaishali, to consider and decide the petitioner's communications (Annexure-2 and 3 series) expeditiously and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of a copy of the present order.

(c) The petitioner undertakes to produce a copy of the order before the said respondent.

(d) The communications of the petitioner shall be considered and action taken, if so required, strictly in accordance with law.

(e) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such other remedies as are available under law, if so required and desired, on the same and subsequent cause of action.

Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations/directions.