High CourtsSingle Bench

Sanjay vs Rafiq Ahmad & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 29 November 2017 · Citation: (2017) 11 DEL CK 0118

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K.Gauba, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
MAC. Appeal No. 973 Of 2012
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 430 words

R.K.Gauba, J

1.

The appellant was the claimant before the tribunal in accident claim case (Suit No.560/2010) instituted on 06.09.2010 seeking compensation for the

injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 07.08.2010 due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle bearing registration no.DL-

1PA-4839 which was admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the third respondent (insurer). On inquiry, the tribunal

found, by judgment dated 09.01.2012, that the injuries suffered by the claimant in the said accident had rendered him permanently disabled, his

functional disability having been assessed to the extent of 75%. The tribunal awarded Rs.15,60,000/- as total compensation, this inclusive of

Rs.8,25,000/- towards loss of income and future earnings due to permanent disability, the liability to pay the compensation so determined having been

fastened on the insurer with interest @ 7.5% per annum.

2.

The appeal seeking enhancement is pressed only on the grounds that while calculating loss of future income, the element of future prospects was

not factored in and the rate of interest levied is on the lower side.

3.

It is noted that the appellant was 31 years old on the relevant date. His income was notionally assessed with the help of minimum wages of an

unskilled workman assessed @ Rs.5278/- per month. Having regard to the ruling of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court rendered on

31.10.2017 in SLP (C) 25590/2014, National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi and Or.,s the element of future prospects to the extent of

40% deserves to be added. The loss of income in future due to disability is recalculated as (5278/- x 140/100 x 75/100 x 12 x 16) Rs.10,64,044.80

rounded off to Rs.10,65,000/-.

4.

The tribunal awarded Rs.8,25,000/- under this head. The award would thus need to be increased by (10,65,000/- (-) 8,25,000/-) Rs.2,40,000/-. The

award is increased to (15,60,000/- + 2,40,000/-) Rs.18,00,000/- (Rupees Eighteen Lacs only).

5.

Following the consistent view taken by this Court, the rate of interest is increased to 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till

realization. [see judgment dated 22.02.2016 in MAC.APP. 165/2011 Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sangeeta Devi & Ors.].

6.

The third respondent is directed to satisfy the enhanced award by requisite deposit with the tribunal within thirty days, it to be released in entirety to

the claimant in the form of fixed deposit receipt to be taken out from a nationalized bank for a period of seven years with right to draw periodic

interest.

7.

The appeal stands disposed of in above terms.