High CourtsSingle Bench

Sanjay vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 20 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 MP CK 0113

HON’BLE JUDGES
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 341, 392, 427 · Madhya Pradesh Dakaiti Aur Vyapharan Prabhavit. Kshetra Adhiniyam, 1981 — Section 11, 13 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.3217 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 410 words

Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J

This is the second bail application u/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant for grant of bail. First bail application was dismissed as withdrawn vide

order dated 06.12.2021 passed in M.Cr.C.No.59732/ 2021.

The applicant was arrested on 15.11.2021 in connection with Crime No.139/2021 by Police Station Tendua, District Shivpuri (M.P.) for the offence

punishable under Sections 392,341,427 of IPC and Section 11,13 of MPDVPK Act.

In brief case of the prosecution is that on 21.10.2021 at about 10:48 pm complainant-Santosh had lodged an FIR before Police Station Tendua, District

Shivpuri alleging that on 21.10.2021 at about 03:30 PM when he was going to Gwalior with tankar containing 30 tons oil bearing registration No. M.P.

09 HG 8996 from Agarwal Oil Mill Pvt. Ltd. Fatehnagar, Udaypur. As soon as, he reached near Police Station Tendua, four persons came there with

a motorcycle and stopped the tankar. Thereafter, two persons climbed the tankar and dropped down the complainant and remaining two other persons

took the tankar towards Shivpuri. Thereafter, he chased with another tankar to the aforesaid tankar and found that the tankar was laying down on the

road and spread the oil here and there. Thereafter, he informed to the owner of the tankar. On his report, an FIR has been registered against the

unknown persons. Matter was investigated, and during investigation, applicant accused Sanjay and other accused were apprehended. At his behest

Rs.300/- was seized.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since 15.11.2021.

He is ready to abide all the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Therefore, prayed for grant of bail.

Learned State counsel has opposed the bail application and prays for its rejection.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case and the applicant is in custody since 15.11.2021 and also charge-sheet has been filed without

commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the application should be allowed and by allowing the application it is ordered

that if the applicant furnishes bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the

trial Court, he should be released on bail.

He will present during trial before the trial Court on each and every date.

Application stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.