AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
29 paragraphs · 296 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar State Food
and Civil Supplies Corporation.
In this case the petitioner is claiming that he is entitled
to Rs.48,69,288/- for the work of supplying of food grains on door
to door basis under Public Distribution System.
The facts of this case are that the petitioner was
selected as a contractor and was to distribute the food grains on
door to door basis under Public Distribution System. He has
successfully discharged the duty and placed the demand of
Rs.48,69,288/-, which has not been paid by the Bihar State Food
and Civil Supplies Corporation.
Learned counsel for the Bihar State Food and Civil
Supplies Corporation submits that the petitioner should approach
the Deputy Chief of Transport, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies
Corporation for redressal of his grievance, who will consider the
case of the petitioner and if it is found that he is entitled to the
aforesaid amount, then the same will be paid to him.
In such view of the matter, let the petitioner file a
proper representation before the Deputy Chief of Transport, Bihar
State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, narrating entire facts of
his case. If such a representation is filed, the Deputy Chief of
Transport, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation shall
consider the same and if it is found that the petitioner is entitled to
the aforesaid amount, then the same will be paid to him without
unnecessary delay. The entire exercise will be completed by the
authority concerned within a period of two months from the date of filing of the representation by the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, this
writ application is disposed of.
