High CourtsSingle Bench

Sanjay @ Parmanand Anuragi vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 24 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 MP CK 0130

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anjuli Palo, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 304B, 498A · Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 3, 4
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.45328 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 281 words

Anjuli Palo, J

This is second bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant who is in custody since 19.02.2021 in connection with

Crime No. 32/2021 registered at Police Station Nowgaon, District Chhatarpur for offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 304-B r/w 34 of the

Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The previous application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 07.07.2021 in

M.Cr.C.No. 30402/2021.

As per the case of the prosecution, the marriage of the deceased was solemnized with the applicant on 26.05.2021. It is alleged that the applicant

along with co-accused persons harassed the deceased physically and mentally due to which she committed suicide by hanging.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. The co-accused persons namely Arvind Anuragi,

Acche Lal Anuragi, Indrani @ Uma Devi Anuragi and Malti Anuragi have been released on anticipatory bail by this Court. Hence, prayer is made to

release the applicant on bail.

Learned Panel Lawyer and learned counsel for the objector have opposed the bail application. It is submitted that there is specific allegation of

demand of dowry against the present applicant. He demanded money from the deceased for opening shop and purchasing goods. It is further

submitted that the applicant allegedly used to beat the deceased due to which she committed suicide.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, allegation against the applicant and that the case of the co-accused persons is different from that

of the present applicant, I do not find any merits in the case so as to release the applicant on bail.

Accordingly, this M.Cr.C. stands dismissed.