High CourtsSingle Bench

Sanjay @ Sanju vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 2 March 2020 · Citation: (2020) 03 MP CK 0006

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. K. Awasthi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2), 59(A)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 5794 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 403 words

This is first application under Section 439, Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in connection with Crime No. 370/2019, registered at Police Station-Susner,

District-Agar for commission of the offence under Section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915.

As per prosecution story, on the basis of secret information, police intercepted vehicle bearing registration No. MP-70-B-266, which was driven by the

applicant and co-accused-Gopal was sitting in the said vehicle. During search of the vehicle, 69.12 bulk liters of country made liquor has been seized

from the possession of co-accused-Gopal. Thereafter, they were arrested by the police and implicated in the present crime.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present crime. No liquor has been

recovered from the possession of the applicant. The applicant has been implicated in the present crime only on the basis that he is the owner or

possession holder of the vehicle bearing No. MP-70-B-266, in which the alleged liquor was being illegally transported by co-accused-Gopal. The

applicant is not having any criminal antecedents. The applicant is in custody since 15/01/2020. Investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed.

Conclusion of trial will take considerable time. The case registered against the applicant is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. Learned counsel

for the applicant also assured that in future the applicant will not faulted with the provision of Section 59(A) of the M.P. Excise Act. Under these

circumstances, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that no sufficient ground is made out for releasing the applicant on bail, hence the application filed by the applicant

be dismissed.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, but without commenting on the

merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his regular

appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the court concerned during trial and shall also abide

by the conditions enumerated under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

In case of bail jump this order shall become ineffective.

Certified copy as per rules.