AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
18 paragraphs · 344 wordsSandeep Sharma, J
By way of present Contempt Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent
for having intentionally and deliberately disobeyed judgment dated 2.12.2019, passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.2327 of 2019, titled
as Sanjay Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others.
Careful perusal of aforesaid judgment, alleged to have been violated, (Annexure PA), reveals that Division Bench of this Court having taken note
of the statement made by the learned counsel representing the petitioner that his client shall be content if a direction is issued to the respondents to
constitute a Departmental Promotion Committee and consider the petitioner for induction into Himachal Pradesh Administrative Services, disposed of
the petition with a direction to the respondents to constitute a Departmental Promotion Committee to examine claim of the petitioner qua his induction
into the cadre of Himachal Pradesh Administrative Services within two months. Since no action, whatsoever came to be taken by the respondent in
pursuance to aforesaid judgment, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.
Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, learned Additional Advocate General while accepting notice on behalf of the respondent states that though he has every
reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid judgment alleged to have been violated, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be
complied with within a period of two weeks from today.
Consequently, in view of the fair statement made by learned Additional Advocate General, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition
alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondent to do the needful within a period of two weeks, if not already
done, failing which, he would further aggravate the contempt. Petitioner is at liberty to get the present proceedings revived in case aforesaid judgment
is not complied with, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law is taken against erring official. Notices issued to the respondent is hereby
discharged accordingly.
