High CourtsSingle Bench

Sanjeev Agrawal vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 17 July 2023 · Citation: (2023) 07 MP CK 0081

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2)
RESULT
Allowed/Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 27632 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 363 words

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J

1.

Case diary is available.

2.

With the consent, heard finally.

3.

This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant as he has been arrested on 20.6.2023 in connection with Crime No.348/2023 registered at Police Station Jhansi Road, District Gwalior for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Excise Act.

4.

Prosecution story, in brief is that on 20.6.2023 the applicant was found having 106 bulk litres of illicit country made liquor for the purposes of sale.

5.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that nothing has been seized from the possession of the applicant. Liquor which has been seized from the possession of the applicant was seized from the public place. No offence is made out against the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in custody since 20.6.2023. The charge sheet has been filed. Trial will take time to conclude and therefore, in the aforesaid circumstances, applicant is entitled for grant of bail.

6.

Learned counsel for the respondent/State has vehemently opposed the prayer and prayed for its rejection. However, it is fairly conceded that the applicant has no criminal history.

7.

Heard the learned counsel for both the parties.

8.

Having considered the rival submission, material pointed out by the learned counsel for the applicant, quantity of liquor seized from the possession of the applicant, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail, hence the application is allowed.

9.

It is directed that the applicant be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before the Trial Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the Trial Court during the pendency of trial. It is further directed that applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C.

10.

This application is allowed and stands disposed of.

11.

Certified copy, as per Rules.