High CourtsSingle Bench

Sanjoy Maity vs State of West Bengal & Ors

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 20 February 2026 · Citation: (2026) 02 CAL CK 1598

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jay Sengupta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 — Section 23
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WPA 25259 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 308 words

Jay Sengupta, J

1.

This is an application praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 29.07.2023, thereby referring the matter before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Haldia, the respondent no.7 herein and for directing the said authority to take a decision strictly as per the provisions of Section 23 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the interested parties, to remove and/or demolish the entire illegal and unauthorised construction so erected on the waterbody and to restore the land to its original nature.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there was an illegal construction made on the waterbody. The petitioner had made complaints before the appropriate authorities. But, no action was taken.

3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that since a representation is pending consideration, the same would be considered in accordance with law.

4.

Learned counsel for the respondent no.10 submits that the dispute, at best, is civil in nature.

5.

It appears that the representation of the petitioner dated 29.07.2023 is pending consideration.

6.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, let the respondent no.5 consider the said representation in accordance with law and after hearing the interested parties including the petitioner and the private respondents and decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.

7.

Within a week from passing the order, the same shall be communicated to the present petitioner.

8.

With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

9.

However, the merits of the case have not been gone into.

10.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.