AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
48 paragraphs · 619 wordsHeard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case.
The special leave petition has been filed by the petitioners for seeking permission to travel abroad to do further studies. He has been offered admission in Masters program in Biotechnology for a period of two years for which the petitioner has got admission in a university in Melbourne, Australia. The learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) opposes this application mainly on three grounds that (i) there is possibility of the petitioner not coming back to India; (ii) investigation is still continuing and it will be difficult to associate the petitioner with the investigation if permission is granted and (iii) it is lastly submitted that the trial may be delayed and the petitioner may not be available to face trial for two years. The apprehensions of the CBI can be met with by passing suitable directions in this regard.
It is true that the petitioner is accused of serious offence but at the same time we have to keep in mind that he is a young person and wants to pursue his studies abroad. What we have to ensure is that he shall be present for investigation as and when required and shall also be available for facing trial.
Keeping all these factors in view, we had directed the petitioner to place on record the list of properties owned by his father so that sufficient security should be obtained before permitting him to travel abroad.
Pursuant to our order, the petitioner's father has filed an affidavit and along with the affidavit he has given details of the details of the immovable assets which are as follows:
Type (Residential/ Commercial/ Plot/ Agricultural
Address
Area
Ownership (In case of Joint ownership,
please mention names of all the owners
Status Mortgaged/ Free
Approximate Market value
Residential House
New Palasia, Indore
NIL
NIL
60 Lakhs
Agriculture Land
Datoda
1.75 acres
NIL
NIL
30 Lakhs
Flat 306
Radhe Regency, Rajendra Nagar
1200 sq.feet
Sanket Vaidya
NIL
17 lakhs
Flat 104
Bhaskar Appt., Saket Nagar
1000 sq.feet
NIL
NIL
50 Lakhs
Office No.103
Manav Trade Centre, South Tukoganj
600 sq.feet
NIL
NIL
10 Lakhs
TOTAL
167 Lakhs
In addition thereto, there are other movable assets but we are concerned only with one Fixed Deposit Receipt in the Bank of Maharashtra of the value of Rs.1,26,94,953/-. Learned counsel submits that valuation of the property is given as per the valuation at the time of purchase and the value has increased manifold. We are not concerned with the increase of value. Whatever be the value of the property, we direct that the petitioner shall only be permitted to go abroad in case the father, secures the attendance of the petitioner by furnishing security of all the immovable properties mentioned herein above and also deposit the Fixed Deposit Receipts for Rs.1,26,94,953/- with the Trial Court.
We further direct that the petitioner shall be available for investigation as and when required. However, since he is studying abroad, we request the CBI try to call him not more than once in four months and whatever investigation has to be done should be done in one go in three-four days instead of calling him time and again. The petitioner must ensure his presence on the time when his appearance is required for investigation. The petitioner shall file an affidavit to this effect before the Trial Court within two weeks.
It is made clear that in case the petitioner violates his undertaking at the first instance, Fixed Deposit Receipts for Rs.1,26,94,953/- shall stand forfeited.
The special leave petition stands disposed of in the terms aforesaid.
Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
