High CourtsSingle Bench

Sanno vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 3 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 UK CK 0023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 534 Of 2023

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 137 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Sanno is in judicial custody in FIR No. 36 of 2023, under Sections 379, 411, 34 IPC, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District - Haridwar.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that the co-accused has already been granted bail by the Court below. The role assigned to the present applicant is also similar.

4.

This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State.

5.

Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is, accordingly, allowed. Let the applicant be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.