High CourtsSingle Bench

Santosh Kumar vs State

Delhi High Court · Decided on 4 October 2001 · Citation: (2002) 61 DRJ 552

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surinder Kumar Aggarwal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 406, 498A
CASE NUMBER
Criminal M. (M) No. 1163 of 2001
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 228 words

S.K. Agarwal, J.—This is a petition u/s 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 175/2001, under Sections 406/498A IPC, P.S. Kalkaji.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has already participated In the Investigation ; he Is n Government servant having clean antecedents; all articles of jewellery have been returned and nothing is due and payable ; he is ready and willing to pay Rs. 50,000/- by way of bank draft in the name of complainant towards her claim of unrecovered Istridhan articles, without prejudice to his rights and contentions. Learned APP for State, on instructions, submits that petitioner has already participated in the investigations and the dispute is only with regard to the Istridhan articles. Complainant who is present in person, also submits that without prejudice to her rights and contentions, she is ready and willing to accept Rs. 50,000/- towards her claim of unrecovered Istridhan articles.

3.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, in the event of his arrest, is ordered to be released on bail, on his furnishing personal bond in, the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/SHO, subject to the condition of his giving draft of Rs. 50,000/-. Petitioner shall not visit the jurisdiction of P.S. Kalkaji.

4.

Petition stands disposed of.

5.

dusty.