High CourtsSingle Bench

Santosh Kumar Nat @ Nath vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 20 June 2024 · Citation: (2024) 06 OHC CK 0027

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Mohapatra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 394
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 5990 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 551 words

A.K. Mohapatra, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Opposite Party. Perused the materials placed before this Court.

3.

The present bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the Petitioner for regular bail in connection with G.R. Case No.594 of 2023, arising out of Bada Bazar P.S. Case No.89 of 2023, pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C (LR&LTV), Berhampur for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 394 of I.P.C.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that earlier this matter was not before any other Bench of this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2023. He further contended that investigation has been concluded and charge sheet has been filed. Further, referring to the F.I.R., learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the F.I.R. was initially lodged against an unknown accused persons and no T.I. parade has been conducted in the present case. In such view of the matter learned counsel for the Petitioner contended the Petitioner be released on bail on such terms and conditions as this Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

5.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel on the other hand opposed the bail application of the Petitioner on the ground that the man is not living in the State of Odisha. Further in the event the Petitioner is released on bail, the same would cause delay in conclusion of the trial. Therefore, on such ground, learned counsel for the State submitted that the bail application of the Petitioner be rejected at this juncture.

6.

Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and on careful consideration of the surrounding facts as well as materials on record, this Court is inclined to release the Petitioner on bail subject to imposition of stringent conditions.

7.

Hence, it is directed that the Petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court in seisin over the matter subject to the following terms and conditions:

I) The Petitioner shall also file an affidavit before the Trial Court with regard to indicating there his residential details other details like Aadhar No., Phone No. before the jurisdictional police station & further release of the Petitioner shall be subject to verification of such details as would be furnished by any relative of the Petitioner in the shape of an affidavit.

II) he shall not be involved in any offence of similar nature while on bail;

III) he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or try to threaten or influence the witnesses in any manner whatsoever;

IV) he  shall  not  make  any  default  in  attending  the  court during trial on each date without fail;

V) he shall appear before the concerned Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on ‘Sunday’ in between 10.00 A.M. to 1.00 P.M. till conclusion of the trial.

Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

8.

The BLAPL is, accordingly, disposed of..

……………………………….