High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 11 RAJ CK 0067

Santosh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Atar Singh Sharma vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 23 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammad Rafiq, Kailash Chandra Sharma
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
20669 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 237 words
1.

Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that

petitioner is serving his sentence of life imprisonment in central

Jail Sewar, Bharatpur. Against the judgment of conviction and

sentence, he has filed appeal, which is pending.

2.

It is contended that marriage of petitioner''s younger brother

namely Rajkumar (Raju) is going to be solemnized on 04.12.2017.

Petitioner''s father namely; Atar Singh has already died on

26.09.2007 and there is no other person in his family who can

make arrangement and manage the marriage. His mother is in her

old age who usually remains sick. A certificate has been issued by

the Sarpanch of concerned Gram Panchayat mentioning therein

that if he be released on parole then there will not be any

disturbance in the village. It is therefore prayed that petitioner be

granted emergent parole of 30 days.

3.

Learned Additional Advocate General opposed the writ

petition.

4.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Additional Advocate General, we find that this matter ought to

receive consideration of the District Collector, Bharatpur, who has

the power to consider and grant the request for emergent parole

in appropriate cases.

5.

It would be open to the petitioner to make fresh application

along with all the relevant documents to the District Collector,

Bharatpur, who shall consider and decide the application within

five days from the date of its making.

6.

The writ petition is disposed off.