AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 494 wordsAchal Kumar Paliwal, J
This first application under Section 482 of The Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed on behalf of the applicants for grant of anticipatory bail.
Applicants apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 728/2025 of Police Station-Gotegaon, District-Narsinghpur (MP) for commission of the offences punishable under Sections 108 read with section 3(5) of BNS has knocked the portal of this Court for grant of anticipatory bail.
Prosecution story in brief is that applicants threatened deceased to falsely implicate him in a false case of rape and also harassed and tortured deceased and on account of which, deceased committed suicide by consuming sulphas.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that incident is said to have occurred in the intervening night of 24-25/09/2025. It is urged that post mortem was conducted on 25.09.2025 and suicide note was recovered on 26.09.2025 at the behest of deceased's brother. It is urged that applicant no. 2's daughter was in relationship with deceased and 20 days prior to the incident, deceased was caught red handed with the applicant No.2's daughter and compromise took place between the parties. Thereafter, again deceased started talking to applicant No.2's daughter. It is also urged that on 21.09.2025, deceased committed theft of gold and silver jwelleries and the matter was reported with the police out post. With respect to aforesaid, police has interrogated the deceased. It is also urged that at the time of investigation, no suicide note was recovered. Further, applicant No. 1 is owner of the field and applicant no. 2 was working in the field of applicant no.1. It is also urged that in the instant case, ingredients constituting offence under Section 108 of BNS is not made out. On these grounds, learned counsel for the applicant prays for grant of anticipatory bail.
Per-contra, learned counsel for the respondent-State opposes the anticipatory bail application.
Heard. Perused record to the case.
Having regard to evidence available on record and also the suicide note but without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I am of the view that it is a case in which applicants may be released on bail. Consequently, anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of applicants stands allowed.
It is directed that in the event of their arrest, applicants be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. It is also directed that the applicants shall abide by the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. It is made clear that applicants shall appear before the Investigating Officer as & when they are so directed and cooperate with the investigation and he shall also appear before the Trial Court failing which their bail shall automatically stand cancelled without further reference to the Court.
9 C.C. as per rules.
