High CourtsSingle Bench

Santuram Koyam vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 23 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 CHH CK 0049

HON’BLE JUDGES
Goutam Bhaduri, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 20(b)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 1813, 1872 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 407 words

Heard on I.A. Nos. 01/2021 (in both the cases) repeat bail applications for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellants.

The Appellants have been convicted by the judgment dated 29/08/2017, passed in Special Criminal case No. 06/2016 by the Special Judge (NDPS

Act), Balod, District Balod (C.G.) for offence punishable under section 8/20(b) of the Narcotic Psychotropic Substances Act and have been awarded

R.I. for 10- 10 years each with fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo additional R.I. for 3 months.

Learned Counsel for appellant Santuram Ram in Cr.A No. 1813/2017 submits that the appellant is in jail since 01/06/2016, thereby he has completed

more than half of the jail sentence and hearing of the appeal may take some time, therefore appellant may be released on bail.

Learned counsel for appellant Nasir Ahmed in Cr.A No. 1872/2017 submits that the appellant is in jail since 07/06/2016, thereby he has completed

more than half of the jail sentence and hearing of the appeal may take some time, therefore appellant may be released on bail.

Learned State Counsel opposes the bail applications, however, he does not dispute the fact that appellants have suffered more than half of the jail

sentence.

Considering the fact that the appellants of both the cases have suffered more than half of the jail sentence and hearing of the appeal will take some

time, therefore I am inclined to release the appellants on bail.

Accordingly, I.A. Nos.01/2021 (in both the cases) repeat bail applications for suspension of sentence and grant of bail are allowed.

Execution of further substantive jail sentence & fine imposed on the appellants (in both the cases) shall remain suspended during the pendency of this

appeal and they are directed to be released on bail on each of them executing personal bond for a sum Rs.25,000/- with one surety each for the like

sum to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance before the Registry of this Court on 24/08/2021. They shall thereafter appear before the

trial Court on a date to be given by the Registry of this Court and shall continue to appear there on all such subsequent dates as are given to them by

the said Court, till the disposal of this appeal.

The fine sentence imposed upon the appellants are suspended. It is made clear that this will not be treated as precedent in any other case.