AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 442 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.
The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.109/2019 of Police Station Asind, Bhilwara for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 376 IPC and 3/4 of POCSO Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after rejection of the second bail application of the petitioner, statements of the prosecutrix and her parents have been recorded. It is submitted that from the evidence of the prosecutrix, it is clear that the complaint regarding the alleged incident of sexual assault was lodged with delay of four days. It is submitted that the prosecutrix in her evidence has admitted that though she had opportunity to tell about the incident to various other persons soon after the said incident but she did not disclose it to anybody. It is submitted that though the police have concluded that on the date of the incident, the prosecutrix was minor but parents of the prosecutrix in their statements have specifically admitted that they did not know the exact date of birth of the prosecutrix and got her date of birth recorded in the school record as per their guess. It is further submitted that as a matter of fact, the prosecutrix and the petitioner were in relation; the prosecutrix went to attend a programme in the night and during that programme, she went with the petitioner for around one hour as per her own free will. It is also submitted that when she returned to the programme, some persons present there, saw her and made a complaint to the parents of the prosecutrix, then they pressurized the prosecutrix to complain against the petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sanwar Lal Balai S/o Bheru Lal Balai shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.109/2019 of Police Station Asind, Bhilwara provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
