AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
18 paragraphs · 410 wordsRameshwar Singh Malik, J.—The petitioners have approached this Court by way of instant petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction to
their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have married each other of
their own free will but against the wishes of private respondents. Apprehending danger to their life, the petitioners have approached this Court by
way of instant petition. Notice of motion was issued and reply thereto has been filed by the private respondents as well as by the State. Learned
counsel for the private respondents submits that the petitioners have concealed material facts from this Court and they are not entitled for the relief
claimed by them.
The limited prayer made in the present petition is for protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents. The
present petition is disposed of with a direction to Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala-respondent No. 2 to look into the threat perception
raised by the petitioners as and when the petitioners approach him in this regard. Thereafter, respondent No. 2 shall pass the appropriate orders in
accordance with law so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents.
However, lest this order is misunderstood, it is clarified that this order shall not mean that the petitioners had reached the age of marriage, as
required by the law applicable to them, at the time of their marriage or that their marriage is legal as per the relevant provisions of law. I say so
because neither it is the issue involved in the present petition nor this Court is putting its seal of approval on the validity of marriage of the
petitioners. In fact, it is the domain of the matrimonial Court of competent jurisdiction, to decide the validity of the marriage and that too on the
basis of the pleadings taken and the evidence led by the parties in the given circumstances of each case.
It is also made clear that this order shall not entitle the petitioners for any protection against their arrest or continuance of any criminal
proceedings, if they are found involved in the commission of any cognizable offence. In case the petitioners had committed any offence, the law will
take its own course. With the observations made above, the present petition stands disposed of.
