AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
44 paragraphs · 379 wordsPetitioner has assailed order dated 14.07.2009,
whereby he was declared to be a proclaimed offender under
Section 82(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ''the
Cr.P.C .).
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that FIR
No.175 was registered on 14.12.2007 under Section 61 / 1 / 14 of
the Excise Act and under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 IPC at
Police Station Lalru, District SAS Nagar, Mohali. Challan was
presented on 02.12.2008 and the petitioner was placed in
column No.2 of the challan. Thereafter proclamation was
ordered on 04.04.2009 and a notice was issued on 06.06.2009
requiring the petitioner to appear on 11.06.2009. In the event of
non-appearance of the petitioner, he was declared as a
proclaimed offender on 14.07.2009.
Learned counsel further submitted that the
supplementary challan was presented in the absence of the
petitioner on 26.01.2010. The original accused namely Hari Pal
was tried by the trial Court and was ultimately acquitted of the
offences vide judgment of acquittal on 27.08.2014.
Learned counsel assailed the impugned order on three
counts, firstly in view of Section 82(1) Cr.P.C., clear 30 days
notice was required to be given from 06.06.2009 onwards for
the appearance of the petitioner. Further adjournments from
11.06.2009 onwards should have entailed in issuance of fresh
notice to the petitioner in view of Ashok Kumar vs. State of
Haryana and another, 2013(4) RCR (Criminal) 550. Secondly,
the petitioner was required to be served by complying the
provisions in terms of Section 105(b) Cr.P.C. Thirdly, for the
offences in question, at the most the petitioner could have been
declared a proclaimed person. Petitioner is ready and willing to
appear before the trial Court.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Addl.
A.G., Punjab accepted the notice on behalf the respondent-
State.
Heard.
Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, it would be
just and appropriate to direct the petitioner to surrender before
the trial Court within a period of two weeks from today. In the
event of surrender by the petitioner and applying for regular bail,
he shall be admitted on bail by the trial Court. However,
petitioner shall keep on appearing before the trial Court
regularly.
Petition stands disposed of.
