High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 06 RAJ CK 0059

Saroj Meel D/o Shri Ramsukh Meel vs The State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 30 June 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Goverdhan Bardhar
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
7689 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

39 paragraphs · 404 words
1.

The above noted writ petition has been filed with a prayer

that respondents have allotted districts to persons having lessor

marks than the petitioner in their home districts or near their

home districts whereas the petitioner who belongs to Sikar District

has been given posting at Nagaur District.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has

placed reliance on a judgement rendered by a coordinate bench of

this court in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9371/2014 Shiv Prasad

Nmiwal V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors. decided on 20.07.2015

wherein it was held that posting to the petitioner should be given

as per his merit position. Further reliance has also been placed

upon judgment rendered by coordinate bench of this court at

Jaipur in Civil Writ Petition No.15668/2012 Monika Meel V/s The

Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Jaipur wherein it has been

held that meritorious candidates should get preference in their

posting. It is also submitted that one post of School Lecturer

(Physics) is lying vacant in Sahid Chandan Singh Govt. Adarsh

Senior Secondary School Chudoli Khakholi (Dhodh) Sikar.

3.

There is no dispute that the petitioner had obtained 569

position in the merit and has been given posting in district Nagaur

whereas the persons who are lesser meritorious to her have been

given posting either in their home districts or near by.

4.

A perusal of the judgment rendered in the case of Monika

Meel (supra) shows that direction has been given to the State

Government to regulate postings keeping in mind that meritorious

candidates would get preference of posting. In Shiv Prasad

Nimiwal, coordinate bench of this court had also directed the

respondents to give posting to the petitioner as per his merit

position. There is no dispute with the fact candidates less

meritorious than the petitioner have been given their home

districts ignoring the right of the petitioner. This is despite the fact

that a general direction had been given as far back as 2012 to the

State to regular posting of selected candidates as per merit.

5.

In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with a

direction to the respondents to consider case of the petitioner and

give him posting on the basis of his merit, if there is a post that is

lying vacant in District Sikar. The needful be done within a period

of four weeks from today.

6.

The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.