Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 10 CAT CK 0169

Saroj Rawat vs Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 29 October 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Mohd. Jamshed, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 994 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 397 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

The applicant is holding the post of Senior Superintendent in the Department of Social Welfare under the Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Next promotion is

to the post of Joint Director. (Technical). It is stated that though the applicant became eligible to be promoted to the post in the year, 2017 and there

existed a clear vacancy, the respondents are not considering his case. Earlier, she filed OA No. 239/2020 ventilating her grievance. The OA was

disposed of on 28.01.2020 directing that the respondents shall take necessary steps and in case there exists any impediment for them to take such

steps, they shall indicate the reasons.

2.

In compliance with the same, the respondents passed orders dated 16.03.2020 stating that the recruitment rules for the Post of Joint Director are in

the process of preparation and the proposal in this behalf was submitted to the Lieutenant Governor on 14.11.2019. It is also stated that the rules are

framed. This OA is filed challenging the said order. The applicant contends that a permanent employee cannot be deprived of his right of his

promotion for such a long time.

3.

The respondents filed a counter affidavit reiterating the stand taken in the order dated 16.03.2020.

4.

We heard Mr. Yogesh Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Yadav and Mr. Hanu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the respondents.

5.

The Post of Joint Director happens to be of much importance, for the department. For some reason or the other, the post was kept unfilled pending

finalisation of the recruitment rules. Even according to the respondents, the draft rules were submitted on 02.11.2007. It is just un-understandable as to

how the matter can be kept pending for such a long time. It only shows the lack of proper interest on the part of the administration.

5.

We, therefore, dispose of the OA directing respondents No. 1 to 3, that the rules that are in place, shall be notified within a period of three months

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order subsequent to that, steps for promotion shall be taken within one month thereafter. In case there exists

any problem for the respondents they shall consider the feasibility of promoting the applicant on adhoc basis to the post of Joint Director (Technical).

There shall be no order as to costs.