High CourtsSingle Bench

Sarpanch Ashwani Kumar @ Ashwani Kumar vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 May 2023 · Citation: (2023) 05 P&H CK 0091

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 362, 439, 482
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 20384 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 292 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

299

23.11.2022

Tanda, District Hoshiarpur

307, 324 IPC and 25, 27 of Arms Act, 1959

1.

The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, came up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail.

2.

In paragraph 25 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3.

Petitioner’s contention is that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.

4.

State opposes the bail.

REASONING:

5.

The allegations against the petitioner are of firing a bullet shot on chest of complainant, when complainant refused to board in his car as he was under the influence of liquor. A perusal of the bail petition and the documents attached, primafacie points towards the involvement of the petitioner and does not make out a case for bail. Any further discussions are likely to prejudice the petitioner; this court refrains from doing so.

6.

Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the merits of the case nor shall the trial Court advert to these comments.

Petition dismissed in terms mentioned above. However, considering the petitioner's custody, the ends of justice will meet by expediting the trial. This court requests the concerned trial court to take up this trial on priority and endeavor to conclude it by Sept 31, 2023. The expediting of the trial is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall not seek any adjournment, and if he does so, this order expediting the trial shall stand recalled automatically under section 362, read with 482 CrPC, without any further reference to this court. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.