High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 DEL CK 0501

Sarthak Bhatia vs Jawaharlal University & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Siddharth Mridul, J
RESULT
Diposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No.8902 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

34 paragraphs · 534 words

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

CM APPL.34236/2018 (Exemption)

Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

W.P.(C) 8902/2018 & CM APPL.34235/2018 (Directions)

1.

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-

“(i) Call for the records of the proctorial enquiry including the reports leading to the Show Cause Notice and office rder; and

(ii) Issue an appropriate writ quashing Show Cause Notice No. CP /DMRC / DA / DPRR / JNU / 2018 /2573dated  9.04.2018; and

(iii) Issue an appropriate writ quashing office order No.141/CB/2018 dated 11.07.2018; and

(iv) Direct the framing, publication, and adherence to proper norms and guidelines for the conduct of proctorial enquiries; and

(v) Award the petitioner costs related to the filing of the present petition; and

(vi) Pass any such further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the instant case and / or in the interest of

justice.â€​

2.

The petitioner is a student of Jawaharlal Nehru University (hereinafter referred to as “JNUâ€), currently pursuing M.Phil Course, at the Centre

for Comparative Politics and Political Theory, School of International Studies.

3.

The petitioner is aggrieved by a Show Cause Notice bearing No. CPO/DMRD/DA/DPRR/DA/JNU/2018/2573, dated 19.04.2018 and the resultant

Office Order No.141/CP/2018 dated 11.07.2018, whereby, the JNU has found him guilty of conduct unbecoming of a student and visited him with a

fine of Rs.10,000/-, in addition to, transfer to another hostel from the present accommodation.

4.

Notice.

5.

Ms. Monika Arora, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/JNU.

6.

Ms. Monika Arora, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the JNU states that an appeal against the impugned Office Order dated

11.07.2018, shall lie before the Appellate Authority.

7.

The petitioner, it is stated, has since deposited with the JNU the fine of Rs.10,000/-, imposed upon him vide the impugned order dated 11.07.2018.

8.

In view of the foregoing, the present writ petition is disposed of, whilst granting liberty to the petitioner to assail the impugned order by filing an

appeal before the Appellate Authority, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from today.

9.

The JNU is directed to dispose of the said appeal, when instituted, expeditiously and in accordance with law, and preferably within a period of eight

weeks thereafter.

10.

Needless to state that, the Appellate Authority shall abide by the principles of natural justice and afford an opportunity to the petitioner to defend

himself against the findings arrived at in the proctorial enquiry, including affording him adequate opportunity of being heard and producing relevant

material.The JNU is directed to maintain a video record of the entire proceedings.

11.

Till the time that the JNU determines the appeal to be instituted on behalf of the petitioner, in accordance with law, it is directed not to take any

coercive action against the petitioner and to make available, all the facilities including, acceptance of thesis, accommodation and registration for course

of study etc., as may be necessary for him to continue with his studies with the University.

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.