High CourtsSingle Bench

Satheesh Kumar vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 19 April 2022 · Citation: (2022) 04 KL CK 0120

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 294(b), 307, 324, 326, 506(ii)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2842 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 524 words

Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This is an application filed u/s 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The petitioners are the accused Nos.3 to 13 in Crime No.449/2022 of Kottarakara Police Station. The offences alleged are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 506(ii), 324, 326, 307, 120B r/w 149 of the IPC.

3.

The prosecution case in short is that the petitioners who are BJP, RSS activists, along with the remaining accused, formed an unlawful assembly, and in prosecution of the common objective of the same, assaulted the defacto complainant who is a CPI(M) activist, on his head with deadly weapons like sword, stick, etc on 24.2.2022 at 9.45 P.M. with an intention to kill him and thereby committed the offences.

4.

Heard both sides and perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are absolutely innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that there are no materials to connect the petitioners with the alleged crime and hence they are entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. He contended that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the petitioners and if the petitioners are released on bail at this stage, it would affect the course of investigation.

6.

Perusal of the case diary would reveal that prima facie there are materials on record to connect the petitioners with the crime. However, the petitioners were remanded to judicial custody. [Accused No.3 is in custody from 28.2.2022, Accused No.4 is in custody from 9.3.2022, Accused Nos.5 to 8 are in custody from 26.2.2022, Accused Nos.9 to 11 are in custody from 1.3.2022, Accused No.12 is in custody from 11.3.2022 & Accused No.13 is in custody from 4.3.2022]. In view of the nature of the crime and the stage of investigation, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the petitioners is required for any purpose. The investigation seems to have reached a fair stage. For all these reasons, the petitioners are entitled to be released on bail on conditions.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioners shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m on every Saturday until further orders. The petitioners shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required by him.

(iv) The petitioners shall not commit any offence of like nature while on bail.

(v) The petitioners shall not make any attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The petitioners shall not leave State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.