High CourtsSingle Bench

Sati Bharti vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 21 June 2019 · Citation: (2019) 06 CHH CK 0063

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 323, 324, 325, 326, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Misc. Criminal Case No.3600 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 302 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.514/2018, registered at Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg, for the offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 506, 324, 325 and 326 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant along with other co-accused persons abused and caused grievous hurt to Mohd. Hakimuddin and his mother Noorjahan by dangerous weapon (axe) and bricks and thereby committed the offence.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has been falsely implicated in the case. The applicant is in jail since 23-3-2019. He further submits that the case of the present applicant is identical to that of the co-accused persons Akshyay Bharti, Sangeet Madhukar and Ashim @ Battu who have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20-5-2019 passed in M.Cr.C.No.3208/2019.

4.

On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offence, facts and circumstances of the case, pretrial detention of the applicant and considering the fact that co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court, I am of the view that it is a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

7.

It is, therefore, directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for her appearance as and when directed.