High CourtsSingle Bench

Satinder Singh and Others vs State of Punjab and Another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 21 May 2014 · Citation: (2014) 05 P&H CK 0237

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anita Chaudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 148, 149, 323, 324, 452
CASE NUMBER
CRM No. M-9356 of 2014 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 400 words

Anita Chaudhry, J.—The instant petition has been filed u/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of F.I.R. No. 78 dated 29.09.2013 registered for the offence under Sections 323, 324, 452, 148 and 149 IPC at police station Mulepur, District Fatehgarh Sahib on the basis of compromise dated 06.02.2014 (Annexure P-2).

2.

Vide order dated 14.03.2014, parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements in support of the compromise. Illaqa Magistrate was also directed to send its report regarding the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Learned Illaqa Magistrate has sent its report dated 12.04.2014 submitting that the compromise arrived at between the parties is without any pressure or coercion and the same is genuine one. Illaqa Magistrate has also sent the statements of parties recorded by it and the photocopy of the compromise.

4.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions from the Investigating Officer and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 admit the factum of compromise and submit that the matter has been compromised between the parties and they would have no objection to the quashing of the FIR in view of the law laid down by the Hon''ble Supreme Court.

5.

I have gone through the record and have heard learned counsel for the parties.

6.

In a decision, based on compromise, none of the parties is a loser. Rather, compromise not only brings peace and harmony between the parties to a dispute, but also restores tranquility in the society. After considering the nature of offences allegedly committed and the fact that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute, continuance of criminal prosecution would be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak.

7.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending. In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another, , approved by Hon''ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another, the instant petition is allowed and the F.I.R. No. 78 dated 29.09.2013 registered for the offence under Sections 323, 324, 452, 148 and 149 IPC at police station Mulepur, District Fatehgarh Sahib is quashed.

8.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.