AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 359 wordsV.K. Sharma, J.—Aggrieved by the impugned order dated 24.08.2011, passed by the learned trial court, whereby the prayer of the petitioner (accused) u/s 311 Cr.P.C. for permission to examine his father, Shri Bhagat Singh, by way of additional evidence to prove two cheques said to have been executed by the said Shri Bhagat Singh, which had already been brought on record and exhibited as Ex. DW-1/D and Ex. DW-1/C, has been declined on the ground that firstly the name of the said Shri Bhagat Singh does not find place in the list of witnesses filed by the accused and secondly that the said list has already been exhausted and moreover the cheques have already been exhibited, he is in revision before this Court.
By now it is fairly settled that mere exhibition of a document would not amount to its proof in accordance with law. In such circumstances, there being no serious opposition to the prayer of the petitioner herein for leading additional evidence from the side of the respondent (complainant), I am satisfied that it shall be expedient and in the interest of justice that accused is afforded an opportunity to lead additional evidence by examining the aforesaid Shri Bhagat Singh to prove cheques Ex. DW-1/D and Ex. DW-1/C, being the person who is said to have issued those cheques.
In view of the above, the petition is allowed and the accused is permitted to lead additional evidence by examining the said Shri Bhagat Singh, as a witness in defence. The parties are directed to appear before the learned trial court on 04.01.2012. The accused shall take requisite steps to summon the said witness in additional evidence within a week thereafter positively and since the witness is his own father, he shall ensure that he makes himself available for recording his evidence before the learned trial court on a date to be fixed by it for which no further adjournment shall be granted. The records be sent back so as to reach the learned trial court well before the date fixed.
The petition, so also pending Cr.MP(s), shall stand disposed of in the above terms.
