High CourtsSingle Bench

Satwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 P&H CK 0178

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jitendra Chauhan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CWP-8549-2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 260 words

JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J.

This writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the issuance of a writ, in the nature of mandamus directing the

respondents to count the service rendered by the petitioners on the post of SPOs as qualifying service for the purpose of seniority for the post of

Constables.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that case of the petitioners is identical to the case of Constable Rajinder Kumar No.75/189 who has been

allowed necessary relief in terms of Annexure P-5. Learned Senior Counsel states that at this stage he would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to

respondents to consider and decide claim of the petitioners in the light of Annexure P-5 passed in case of Constable Rajinder Kumar.

Heard.

In view of the above, without adverting to the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider and

decide claim of the petitioners in the light of Annexure P-5 passed in case of Constable Rajinder Kumar within six weeks from the receipt of the

certified copy of the order. In case, on consideration, the competent authority reaches to the conclusion that the benefit claimed by the petitioners is

admissible to them, in such eventuality, the consequential relief be allowed to them, within a period of six weeks thereafter. However, in case the

competent authority feels that the relief claimed by the petitioners is not admissible to them or made out, in that case, a speaking order be passed in

the matter.