High CourtsSingle Bench

Satya Bhuwal And Ors vs Dinu Thakur And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 19 February 2018 · Citation: (2018) 02 CHH CK 0313

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sam Koshy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 173
RESULT
Allowed/Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Appeal (C) No. 586 Of 2015
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 399 words

P. Sam Koshy, J

1.

The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed by the owner against the award dated 28.01.2015 passed by the 6th

Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Durg (in short, the Tribunal) in Claim Case No.34/2012. Vide the impugned award, the Tribunal has

awarded compensation of Rs.72,250/- along with interest @ 6 percent per annum from the date of application.

2.

While passing the award, the liability of payment of compensation has been fastened upon the appellant-owner and has exonerated the insurance

company from its liability.

3.

The contention of the appellant-owner is that during the proceedings before the Tribunal, he could not lay hand on the insurance policy of the

offending vehicle, however, in the appeal he has produced a copy of policy of the offending vehicle valid at the relevant point of time which has been

marked as Ex. A/3. He submits that in the light of the offending vehicle being duly insured at the relevant point of time, the liability of payment of

compensation therefore may suitably be modified and the insurance company may be directed to indemnify the owner and the liability accordingly be

shifted upon the insurance company.

4.

Shri Dashrath Gupta, appearing for the insurance company had on the previous date taken time to verify the contents of the insurance policy.

Today, on due verification of the policy, he fairly submits that the offending vehicle at the relevant point of time had a valid policy.

5.

In the light of the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, this court has no hesitation in reaching to the conclusion that the finding of the

Tribunal to the extent of liability being fastened upon the appellant-owner deserves to be shifted upon the insurance company and the same is

accordingly ordered.

6.

It is ordered accordingly and the impugned award stands modified inasmuch as the liability of payment of compensation shall now fall jointly and

severally upon the owner,driver and the insurance company and the responsibility of payment of compensation shall be that upon the insurance

company.

7.

It is made clear that the insurance company shall deposit the entire amount before the Tribunal and the amount which has been deposited by the

appellant-owner while filing the appeal, he shall be entitled for the refund of the same.

8.

The appeal thus allowed and disposed of.