High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Satyanarayan S/o Shri Moola Ram By Caste Tanwar (Mali), vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 29 May 2017 · Citation: (2017) 05 RAJ CK 0134

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
CASE NUMBER
4716 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 245 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

2.

The instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has

been preferred on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in

connection with F.I.R. No.105/2015, registered at Police Station

Bajju, District Bikaner for the offences under Sections 420, 467,

468, 471 and 120B IPC.

3.

Bail application of main accused Hetram who executed the

sale deed on the basis of forged power of attorney had been

allowed by this Court. The petitioner simply attested the alleged

forged power of attorney as a witness and is in judicial custody for

offences triable by the Court of Magistrate. Investigation and trial

are likely to consume time.

4.

In this background and having regard to the facts and

circumstances available on record but without expressing any

opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that

the petitioner deserves to be released on bail.

5.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Satyanarayan

arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.105/2015, registered at

Police Station Bajju, District Bikaner shall be released on bail

provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two

surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned

trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all

dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.