High CourtsSingle Bench

Satyapriya Pradhan vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 30 March 2022 · Citation: (2022) 03 OHC CK 0203

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Panigrahi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 302
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No.2782 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 428 words

S.K. Panigrahi, J

1.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

This is the successive bail application filed by the petitioner on the ground of parity.

3.

The Petitioner being in custody in connection with Kantamal P.S. Case No.104 of 2020 corresponding to C.T. Case No.188 of 2020, pending before the court of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Boudh, registered for the alleged commission of offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, has filed this application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for his release on bail.

4.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 23.07.2020 the deceased left his house at about 7.00 P.M. riding his motor cycle and did not return home till late hours of the night. It is further alleged that his mobile was also not responding and that on the next day the dead body of the deceased bearing multiple injuries was found near the Landabahal canal/Nala.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations leveled against him are fabricated and baseless. Further, there is no prima facie evidence available to implicate him in the alleged offence. This entire case is borne out of some previous disputes. Even none has seen the petitioner inflicting any blow on the deceased. Meanwhile, charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has been languishing in custody since 28.07.2020. Moreover, the co-accused has been granted bail by order of this Court vide BLAPL No.6631 of 2020 and by the principle of parity the petitioner seeks to be released on bail

6.

Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner with the submission that the present petitioner does not stand on similar footing with the co-accused.

7.

Having scrutinized the case record, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case with some stringent terms and conditions as deemed just and proper by the learned court in seisin over the matter with further conditions that:-

i. the petitioner shall appear before the learned trial court on each date of posting of the case;

ii. he shall not indulge himself in any criminal offence while on bail; and

iii he shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution witnesses in any manner.

8.

Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail.

9.

The BLAPL is, accordingly, disposed of.

10.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.

.....................................................