AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 258 wordsP. Sam Koshy, J
Heard.
Learned counsel for the parties would jointly and fairly submit that the matter in issue is covered by the common order dated 26.2.2015 passed by
the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ
appeals. Against the said order, the State travelled up to the Supreme Court by filing SLP (C)Nos.11541- 11550/2016, which have been dismissed by
the Supreme Court, affirming the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. They would pray that this writ petition may also be allowed in the
same terms.
In view of the above joint statement made, the present writ petition is also allowed in terms of the common order dated 26.2.2015 passed by the
Division Bench of this Court in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ
appeals. Let the current pension of the petitioners be calculated and payment commenced preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of
receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order and the arrears to be paid within a period of 6 months from the date current pension starts subject to
verification so far as his his entitlement is concerned.
A copy of the order dated 26.2.2015 passed in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other
connected writ appeals, be made a part of this record.
