High CourtsSingle Bench

Saurabh Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 17 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 CHH CK 0060

HON’BLE JUDGES
Goutam Bhaduri, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (Anticipatory Bail) No. 509 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 471 words
1.

Heard.

2.

This application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant apprehending his arrest in connection with

Crime No. 26/21 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Raipur (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 34 of IPC.

3.

As per the prosecution case, a report was made by Ruchi Agrawal that she was married to the present applicant on 18.04.2014 and thereafter she

was subjected to torture by the mother-in-law and sister-in-law and the husband i.e. the present applicant was also party to it. The FIR was lodged on

02.03.2021 that the husband has demanded money by way of dowry.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the main allegations in the FIR were against the mother-in-law and sister-in-law there was

incompatibility from them. He would further submit that the husband also tried to keep the wife in a separate residence and tried to settle their life but

for some reason or the other the relationship could not continue. He would further submit that only general allegations have been made against the

applicant and no custodial interrogation may be required in this case, therefore, the applicant may be given the benefit of anticipatory bail.

5.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and read out the statement of the complaint/wife.

6.

On the earlier occasion learned State counsel was directed to bring the documents of the counseling so as to read the same.

7.

After goring through the statement made during the counseling, the nature of allegations made against the husband/applicant are omnibus and the

considerable time has passed as the out of the wedlock one child is also born. Taking into the totality of facts and the nature of allegations, I am

inclined to allow this anticipatory bail application.

8.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant, he shall be released on

anticipatory bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting officer

with the following conditions:-

(i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the investigation officer as and when required;

(ii) that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the applicant shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial; and

(iv)that the applicant shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to them by the said Court till disposal of the trial.