AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 457 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
The present Application has been filed by the applicant Saurabh Kumar seeking anticipatory bail under Sections 121(1), 126(2), 132, 351(3) and Section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Case Crime No.28 of 2025, registered at Police Station Jhabrera, District Haridwar.
As per the FIR, some boys were causing obstruction to the people on 30.01.2025 at 22: 00 hrs. The inform ant Constable Anil and Home Guard Azad were busy in patrolling duty. He assaulted them and ran away from the spot.
Heard Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the State.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate, submitted that the applicant is an innocent person. He has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He was not present on the spot. He has no criminal antecedents. He is a perm anent resident of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding, and, he was granted interim bail on 13.02.2025 and the terms of the interim bail have not been violated by him.
Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Additional Advocate General, has opposed the anticipatory bail application orally.
Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed and the order dated 13.02.2025, granting interim bail to the applicant, is made absolute. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant, namely Saurabh Kumar, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/ - and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions: -
(i) Applicant shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) If the charge- sheet is filed, the applicant shall attend the trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;
(iii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case.
(iv) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court.
It is made clear that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.
