High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 01 DEL CK 0200

Savita Arora vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Delhi High Court · Decided on 22 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 917 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 423 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

CM APPL.2479/2021 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

W.P(C) 917/2021 & CM APPL.2478/2021

1.

Petitioner impugns a work stop notice dated 29.12.2020 requiring petitioner to stop carrying out any construction activity in the property bearing

No.3417-18, Angoori Ghata, Gali Arya Samaj, Delhi-110006.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the property of the petitioner is an old property and the Municipal Corporation had inspected the

property in the year 2002 and an inspection report dated 30.07.2002 (Annexure P-4) was prepared.

3.

Learned counsel submits that the inspection report clearly indicates the entire extent of construction existing on the ground floor upto the third floor

with dimensions of each portion being indicated therein and it also indicates as to what was the old construction and what additions have been made in

the year 2002.

4.

Learned counsel further submits that petitioner was given an advisory letter by the respondent on 24.06.2019 indicating that the building of the

petitioner is dangerous and he should have the same repaired. He submits that in terms of the said advisory letter petitioner was merely carrying out

repairs, when the impuged notice was received.

5.

Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

6.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that when unauthorised construction activity was noticed in the property a show cause notice was

issued to the petitioner on 20.10.2020.

7.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that a response to the show cause notice has also been filed, however, a speaking order has not yet been

passed. Accordingly, he has approached the MCD Appellate Tribunal and since MCD Appellate Tribunal is not functional, he has approached this

Court. Â

8.

In view of the fact that a show cause notice has already been issued to the petitioner, which has been responded to, Respondents are directed to

grant a personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass a speaking order in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four weeks from

today.

9.

Till the passing of the speaking order petitioner shall not carry out any construction activity and further repairs/renovation work would be dependent

upon the speaking order to be passed by the respondent in accordance with law.

10.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

11.

It is clarified that Petitioner would be at liberty to impugn the speaking order, if required.

12.

Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.