High CourtsSingle Bench

Savita Devi And Ors vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 24 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 JH CK 0196

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 324, 325
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 1703 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 369 words

Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioners personally undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within two weeks after the

lockdown is over.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioners the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter are ignored for the

present.

The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Silli P.S. case no. 51 of 2020 (S.T. no. 295 of 2020) registered under Sections 147, 148,

149, 324, 325, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners along with the co- accused

persons, were members of an unlawful assembly and being armed with deadly weapons in prosecution of common object of the assembly, committed

murder of Sahadeo Mahto and attempted to commit murder of Anima Kumari. It is then submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the

allegation against the petitioners is false and both the petitioners are females. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the

specific allegation of assaulting Sahdeo Mahto is upon Lakhi Ram Mahto and the allegation of assaulting Anima Kumari is upon Chandra Shekhar

Mahto. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners have been in judicial custody since 09.06.2020 as mentioned in

paragraph 1 of the bail application and the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and co-accused with similar

allegations has already been released on bail by this court vide order dated 24.02.2021 passed in BA no. 1663 of 2021, hence, the petitioner may be

released on bail.

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of the case, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail

on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

A.J.C. XXII, Ranchi in connection with Silli P.S. case no. 51 of 2020 (S.T. no. 295 of 2020) subject to the condition that the petitioners will co-operate

with the trial of the case.