High CourtsSingle Bench

Savitri Devi vs The State of Bihar & Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 24 July 2018 · Citation: (2018) 07 PAT CK 0021

HON’BLE JUDGES
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3499 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 567 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and Accountant General.

2.

The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:

“(i) Issuance of a writ/writs/order/orders, direction /directions in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to pay the family

pension to the petitioner without having obstacle and hindrance.

(ii) Issuance of a appropriate writ/writs/order/orders, direction/directions to the respondents to accept the photographs of the petitioner and utilize the

same in appropriate place without making any further delay.

(iii) Issuance of any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled to in the eyes of law.â€​

3.

The issue is with regard to family pension to the petitioner being stopped from November, 2017, even though it was paid to her from January, 2016

to October, 2017, consequent upon the death of her husband on 29.12.2015. The ostensible reason for such stoppage is some objection by the Bank

concerned with regard to there being no joint photograph of the petitioner and her husband.

4.

Learned counsel for the State and Accountant General submitted that from their side, there is no objection raised and it is for the Bank to say as to

why the family pension is not being credited into the account of the petitioner. However, the ground disclosed in the writ petition is that there is no joint

photograph of the deceased with the petitioner. On such ground, learned counsel submitted that once in the P.P.O., the name of the petitioner is

mentioned as the wife and the recipient of family pension, and such payment having been made after the death of the employee, for quite sometime,

there is no genuine ground for creating any obstacle in such payment. However, it was further their contention that if any such photograph is required,

both of them would send duly verified joint photograph of the petitioner to the concerned Bank for the needful.

5.

On such reasonable stand taken on behalf of the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she would submit her joint

photograph to the respondent no. 4.

6.

Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the petitioner to submit a joint photograph to the respondent no. 4

within two weeks from today. Upon the same being done, the respondent no. 4, after proper attestation shall forward the same to the Accountant

General within one week from the petitioner submitting the joint photograph. Upon the same being received by the Accountant General, he shall also

verify/ attest the same and forward in to the Branch Manger, State Bank of India, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna within one week

from the date of receipt of the photograph from the respondent no. 4. Upon receipt of the same, the Branch Manager shall ensure that family pension

is restarted in favour of the petitioner and credited with up-to-date arrears within two weeks from the date of receipt of such verified joint photograph

by him. For the purposes of convenience, let the Branch Manger, State Bank of India, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna be impleaded

as respondent no. 6 in the present writ application. Let necessary correction be made in the cause title of the writ petition by learned counsel for the

petitioner during the course of the day. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall also serve a copy of the order on the newly added respondent no.