High CourtsSingle Bench

Sayuji Satheesh @Ani vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 30 April 2021 · Citation: (2021) 04 KL CK 0250

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 143, 147, 149, 308, 323, 324, 341
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 3193 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 471 words
1.

This is an application filed u/s 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2.

The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No.383/2021 of Valiyathura Police Station, Thiruvanathapuram. The offences alleged are under

Sections 143, 147, 149, 341, 323, 324 and 308 r/w Section 149 of IPC.

3.

The prosecution case in short is that on 19/3/2021, at 6.30 p.m., the petitioner along with the remaining accused formed an unlawful assembly

armed with deadly weapon and assaulted the defacto complainant with a granite stone with intention to kill him and thereby committed the offence.

4.

Heard both sides and perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is absolutely innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He

further submitted that there are no materials to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime and hence he is entitled to get bail. The learned Public

Prosecutor opposed the bail application. He contended that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the petitioner and

if the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, it would affect the course of investigation.

6.

The case records would show that no serious injury has been sustained by the defacto complainant. There is a counter case as well on the

allegation that the defacto complainant and others had attacked the son of the petitioners who has been arrayed as the 2nd accused. Considering the

allegations levelled against the petitioner, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner does not appear to be necessary. For all these reasons, the

petitioner is entitled to pre-arrest bail on conditions.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for `1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent

sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for the purpose of discovery, if

any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m on every Saturday until further orders. The petitioner

shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required by him.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence of like nature while on bail.

(v) The petitioner shall not make any attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or any other way try to

tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The petitioner shall not leave State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.