AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Petitioner has obtained loan from the respondent Bank. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent has charged higher amount of interest
than the agreed rate of interest, therefore, the respondent is liable to refund the excess amount to the petitioner.
It appears, the matter in issue has arisen out of a loan contract and the petitioner had earlier approached the banking Ombudsman, which had
advised the parties to resolve the dispute amicably. Petitioner's subsequent representation to the Ombudsman has also been disposed of for the reason
that a prior complaint has already been disposed of.
The transaction between the parties is arising out of a contract;
any dispute for breach of contract or acting in excess of the terms of the contract would be in the realm of pure civil dispute for which the writ Court
is not entitled to interfere. If the petitioner so desires, it may approach the jurisdictional Civil Court for recovery of the amount of interest allegedly
charged in excess by the respondent Bank.
The writ petition is dismissed.
