High CourtsSingle Bench

S.C. Jayaraman vs E.V. Ramaswami Naicker

Madras High Court · Decided on 8 February 1972 · Citation: (1972) LW(Cri) 55

HON’BLE JUDGES
Somasundaram, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (CrPC) — Section 203
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal R.C. No. 1126 of 1971 and Criminal R.P. No. 1092 of 1971
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 175 words

Somasundaram, J.—S. 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that where the Magistrate dismisses a complaint, because in his

judgment there is no sufficient ground for proceeding with the same, he shall record his reasons for doing so. The District Magistrate in this case

has conducted the enquiry u/s 202 of the Code. He has dismissed the complaint as against the first Respondent without giving any reasons. Clearly

this is wrong. Giving of reasons is a prerequisite for making an order of dismissal of a complaint. The complainant is entitled to know why his

complaint has been dismissed with a view to consider an approach to the revisional court. Being kept in ignorance of the reasons, clearly

prejudices his right to move the revisional court Vide Chandra Deo Singh Vs. Prokash Chandra Bose and Another, For all these reasons, the

order of the District Magistrate dismissing the complaint as against the first Respondent is set aside. He shall go into the matter and deal with it in

accordance with law. The revision is allowed.