High CourtsSingle Bench

S.Chandra vs Regional Transport Officer (II) And Anr

Orissa High Court · Decided on 19 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 OHC CK 0091

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.R. Dash, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 31017 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 209 words

C.R. Dash, J

1.This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The son of the petitioner is stated to have died in a road accident caused by an unidentified vehicle. The petitioner is stated to be entitled to receive

Rs.2 lakhs ex gratia from the solatium fund of the State. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that, the petitioner had approached R.T.O.

(II), Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-Opposite Party No.1 with the Death Certificate of her son. But, as the petitioner had approached the RTO

after six months of the death, the RTO-Opposite Party No.1 refused to accept the application, as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner.

5 Regard being had to the facts and submissions and the nature of relief sought for, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file a

detailed representation along with relevant documents before the RTO(II), Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-Opposite Party No.1 within three weeks

from today. If such representation is filed, the same shall be disposed of by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law, within a period of two

months from the date of its filing.

8.The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

9.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

……………………….....