High Courts

Senthivelu Mudaliar vs Varada Chariar (deceased) and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 9 April 1906 · Citation: (1906) 16 MLJ 353

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 109 words
1.

A preliminary objection is taken that as the suit is one of small cause nature and the sum sued for is under Rs. 500, there is no second appeal.

2.

The answer given is that the suit comes under Article 35(J) in the 2nd Schedule appended to the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. The

objection is, in our opinion, a good one. This is not a suit for compensation for illegal, improper or excessive distress or attachment, but merely for

the recovery of money paid. This second appeal must be dismissed with costs to be calculated on the reduced scale as notice of this objection was

not given.