AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
12 paragraphs · 553 wordsA.K. Mohapatra, J
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. Perused the materials placed before this Court.
This is an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the Petitioner for bail in connection with Lathore P.S.Case No.80 of 2024 corresponding to G.R.Case No.417 of 2024 pending in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M., Patnagarh for alleged commission of offence under Sections 341, 294, 323,307 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2024. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that in the meantime the investigation has been progressed substantially and Charge Sheet is likely to be filed very soon. Referring to the F.I.R. allegation, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that although the injured has sustained some injuries, however some of which are grievous in nature. However, the injured already discharged from the hospital. He is now hale and hearty. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. Further, it is contended by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that since the Petitioner belongs to the locality, there is no chance of his absconding. On such ground, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner be released on bail on stringent conditions.
Learned Additional Government Advocate for the State on the other hand objected to the release of the Petitioner on bail on the ground that the injured has sustained grievous injury. It is also contended that the condition of the injured is not known. In such view of the matter, learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that the bail application of the Petitioner deserves no consideration at this juncture.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for the respective parties, on careful examination of the materials on record as well as the period of custodial detention of the Petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the Petitioner and it is directed that let the Petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court in seisin over the matter. Release of the Petitioner shall also subject to such conditions as would be fixed by the learned court in seisin over the matter.
Further, the release of the Petitioner shall also be subject to the verification of the condition of the injured. In the event the injured has not been discharged from the hospital and his condition is continuing, then the bail order shall not be given effect to.
Further, the release of the Petitioner shall also be subject to the verification of similar nature of criminal antecedent of the Petitioner by the learned Court below. In the event, it is found that the Petitioner has any criminal antecedent of similar nature then the bail order shall not be given effect to.
The BLAPL is, accordingly, disposed of.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.
.…………………………..
