AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 306 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
Present Bail Application has been filed for grant of regular bail in respect of Case Crime No.404 of 2023, registered at Police Station Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar under Section 8 read with Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, “Act, 1985”).
According to the allegations of the First Information Report, 12.05 grams of smack (Heroin) was recovered from the possession of the present applicant on 08.05.2023.
Heard Mr. Gaurav Kandpal, learned counsel for the applicant through video conferencing and Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated; nothing was recovered from his possession; provisions of Section 50 of the Act, 1985 have not been followed; applicant is in custody since 08.05.2023, and, he has no criminal history.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail application orally.
As per Table prepared under Section 2 (xxiii-a) and Section 2 (vii-a) of the said Act, 1985, lesser than 5 grams of smack (Heroin) is small quantity and greater than 250 grams of smack is commercial quantity (Entry No.56).
Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no reason to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.
The Bail Application is allowed.
Let the applicant – Shah Alam Alias Bhura be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
