High CourtsSingle Bench

Shahid Iftikhar vs State & Ors.

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 12 October 1998 · Citation: (1999) KashLJ 596

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.S.Doabia, J
CASE NUMBER
Others Writ Petition (OWP) No. 392/86

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 452 words
1.

The circumstances under which this petition has come to be filed be noticed. The respondent No 3 initiated steps for laying down foundation of

Transmission tower in respect of 132 KV Transmission Line. As these transmission lines were to be taken over and above the land of the

petitioner and as his land was likely to rendered unfit for use he approached this court. It is submitted that if the base of the Electric Tower is raised

then no construction can be raised in a radius of 100 ft around the tower. It is submitted that petitioners are likely to be deprived of the use of the

land. The petitioners submit that they should be paid compensation. It is submitted that if definition of land as occurring in section 3(a) of the Land

Acquisition Act is noticed then a person is supposed to be compensated even when he is to be deprived of any benefit which is likely to arise out

of the land. As the petitioner is going to be deprived of the user of the land when the Transmission Tower is laid, it is submitted that the petitioners

are entitled to compensation.

2.

The transmission tower and the Transmission Lines are laid in terms of Electricity Act of 1910. The over head lines are laid in terms of Section

18 of the Act. As to how a person has to be compensated in case some damages is caused on account of the laying of the transmission line Is

contemplated by Section 19 of the aforementioned Act.

3.

It be seen that this aspect of the matter was considered by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case reported as Rajak Vs. National Termal

Power Indoor AIR 1998 MP 172, it was observed that once a scheme is duly sanctioned then the lisence i,e. the authority which is to lay down

transmission line can go ahead with the laying of these lines, but then compensation has to be paid. The compensation is to be determined on the

same principles, which have been indicated, in the Indian Telegraph Act 1885.

4.

This petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction that the respondentauthorities would take notice of statutory provisions and also Indian

Telegraph Act and determine loss sustained by the petitioners. The petitioners would be at liberty to file their claim petitions also. Loss for

severance if claimed be examined. Let a decision would be taken by the respondentauthorities within a period of six months. The period of six

months would begin from the date of copy of the order along with the writ petition and annexure are made available by the petitioner to the

respondent authorities.

5.

Disposed of accordingly.