High CourtsSingle Bench

Shaju vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 28 April 2023 · Citation: (2023) 04 KL CK 0189

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ziyad Rahman A.A., J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 379
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2623 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 516 words

Ziyad Rahman A.A., J

1.

Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.363 of 2023 of Thiruvalla Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 379 and 34 of Indian Penal code.

2.

The prosecution case is that the accused in furtherance of their common intention, on 09.03.2023 at 2.30 pm, came in the car of the 1st accused and committed theft of the battery of the solar light fixed by the Kuttoor Panchayath at Eradichira worth Rs.30,000/-. The crime was registered in such circumstances and as part of the investigation, the petitioners were arrested on 16.03.2023. Since then, they have been under judicial detention. This application for regular bail is submitted in such circumstances.

3.

Heard Sri. Sasith M.R, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Smt.Seetha S, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent of all the allegations. It is pointed out that, they are in custody since 16.03.2023 and the recovery of the articles were already affected. Therefore, further incarceration of the petitioners are not necessary.

5.

On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor opposed the aforesaid application. However, it is confirmed that the recovery has been affected.

6.

I have gone through the records. It is evident that there are allegations against the petitioners. Besides the present crime, the petitioners are also involved in three other cases which were committed on the very same day. However, the fact remains that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 16.03.2023 and the recovery of the articles were already affected.

7.

In such circumstances, taking note of the period of detention of the petitioners have already undergone and considering the substantial progress in the investigation, I am of the view that, the petitioners can be granted bail. Accordingly, this application is allowed and the petitioners are directed to be released on bail subjected to the following conditions :-

1) The petitioners shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

2) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

3) The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m on every Wednesday until the filing of final report.

4) The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

5) The petitioners shall not commit any offence of similar nature while on bail.

6) The petitioners shall not make any attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

7) The petitioners shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the jurisdictional court.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.