AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
89 paragraphs · 834 wordsThe petitioner in B.A No.7835/2017 is the 2nd accused
in Crime No.960/2017 of the Valiyamala Police Station
registered under Sections 377, 372, 373 and 366 (A) r/w
Section 34 of I.P.C and under Sections 3(a), 4, 5(1), 6 and
17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,
the petitioner in 8001/2017 is the 3rd accused therein, and
the petitioner in B.A 7965/2017 is the 5th accused in the
said crime. The petitioners seek regular bail under Section
439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. When the 2nd
accused seeks bail for the first time, the others seek bail for
the second time. An application for pre-arrest bail filed by
the 2nd accused was disposed of by this Court 24.10.2017,
with direction to surrender before the Investigating Officer.
Accordingly, he surrendered on 30.10.2017 and was
produced before the court below on the same day. His
application for regular bail was dismissed by the court
below. The first application brought by the accused Nos.3
and 5 was dismissed by this Court on 31.10.2017. They
have been in custody since 23.09.2017.
The victim of offence in this case is a girl aged 17
years. The accused Nos.1 and 2 are none other than her
own mother and the step father. The crime involves serious
offences like kidnapping, human trafficking, rape etc. The
prosecution case is that the accused Nos.1 and 2 handed
over the minor girl to different persons for sexual abuse and
sexual exploitation after receiving money from them, and
accordingly the girl was subjected to such abuse by
different persons on different occasions at different places.
The accused Nos.3 and 5 are said to be two among the
persons who subjected the girl to sex at different places. In
short, they are said to be the customers, whereas the
circumstances of the mother and the step father are entirely
different as the persons who handed over the minor for
sexual exploitation to different persons.
These applications are opposed by the State on
the ground that investigation will be adversely affected, if
the petitioners are granted bail. The stand of the
Government is that in the nature of the allegations and the
circumstances, the accused will have to continue in custody
till the whole investigation process is over. Of course, as
regards the accused Nos.1 and 2, I find that they will have to
continue in custody till the whole process is over, because
there is every possibility of the victim being influenced or
threatened or won over by them, if they are granted bail.
But in the case of the others, I do not find such definite
possibilities at this stage. The Police has already collected
the required materials as against the accused Nos.3 and 5.
It appears that they are persons, who probably used the girl
without knowing her actual age. Even according to the
prosecution, the victim was at her running 17 at the time of
the incident. The legal aspects of the offences alleged
against the accused Nos.3 and 5 cannot be now examined.
Prima facie, they are liable under the POCSO Act, the victim
being below the age of 18 years. Anyway, in the
circumstances where the Police has collected materials as
against them, I feel it appropriate to grant bail to them. But
the position and circumstance of the accused Nos.1 and 2
are entirely different. I am not inclined to release the 2nd
accused at this stage for fear that he will try all means
possible to torpedo the process.
In the result, B.A No.7835/2017 is dismissed. But the
other two applications are allowed. Accordingly, those
petitioners (accused Nos.3 and 5) are ordered to be
released on bail on their executing bond with two solvent
sureties for 50,000/-(Rupees Fifty thousand only) each to
the satisfaction of the court below having jurisdiction. Bail is
granted on condition that;
a. The petitioners shall report before the Circle
Inspector of Police, Nedumangad between 10.00 am and 11
am on all Mondays for a period of two months.
b. The petitioner shall not enter the limits of the
Valiyamala Police Station for two months.
c. The petitioners shall not in any manner influence
or intimidate the witnesses and they shall not have any
contact with the material witnesses directly or over
telephone or otherwise.
d. The petitioners shall make a security deposit of
10,000/- each in the court below as a further condition for B.A No.8225 of 2017.
bail.
e. The petitioner shall not involve in any offence of
similar nature involving sexual abuse or sexual exploitation
or human trafficking under the Indian Penal Code or under
the POCSO Act, till trial of the case is over.
f. The petitioners shall not enter the the building,
house or the premises where the victim has been residing,
till trial of the case is over.
Forward a copy of this order to the Circle Inspector of
Police, Nedumangad who will report compliance of the
conditions, directly to the court below.
